Plain English
GovGreed Synthesis · 2025-09-18
District of Columbia Policing Protection Act This bill repeals restrictions on the circumstances under which law enforcement officers in the District of Columbia (DC) may engage in vehicular pursuits (i.e., police chases) of suspects fleeing in motor vehicles, and instead generally requires such pursuits in the absence of other means of apprehension. Currently, pursuant to DC's Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022, law enforcement officers generally may not engage in vehicular pursuits of suspects fleeing in motor vehicles unless the officer reasonably believes (1) the suspect was involved in a crime of violence or poses an immediate and serious threat to another person, (2) the pursuit is necessary to prevent that threat and is not likely to result in death or serious injury to any person, and (3) all other options have been exhausted or are unreasonable given the circumstances. The bill repeals these restrictions and instead requires law enforcement officers to engage in vehicular pursuits of suspects fleeing in motor vehicles unless the officer or a higher-ranking officer reasonably believes that (1) such pursuit would be futile, (2) the pursuit would entail an unacceptable risk of harm to a person other than the suspect, or (3) the suspect can be apprehended more effectively or expeditiously by other means. The bill also requires the Department of Justice to report to Congress on the costs and benefits of DC’s Metropolitan Police Department adop
Market Impact Map
Action Timeline
2025-09-18
Received in the Senate.
2025-09-17
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2025-09-17
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 245 - 182 (Roll no. 275). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4379)
2025-09-17
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 245 - 182 (Roll no. 275). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4379)
2025-09-17
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4395)
2025-09-17
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 5143, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill, and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Garcia (CA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postpone
2025-09-17
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
2025-09-17
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 5143.
2025-09-17
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4922, H.R. 5143, H.R. 5140, H.R. 5125, H.R. 1047, H.R. 3015 and H.R. 3062. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4922, H.R. 5143, H.R. 5140, H.R. 5125, H.R. 1047, H.R. 3015, and H.R. 3062
2025-09-17
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 707. (consideration: CR H4379)
Full Bill Text
119 HR 5143 EH: District of Columbia Policing Protection Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 5143 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To establish standards for law enforcement officers in the District of Columbia to engage in vehicular pursuits of suspects, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the District of Columbia Policing Protection Act of 2025 . 2. Vehicular pursuits by law enforcement officers in District of Columbia (a) Amendment The Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. Law 24–345) is amended— (1) in subtitle S of title I— (A) in the heading, by striking LIMITATIONS ON THE ; (B) in section 127(a) (sec. 5–365.01(a), D.C. Official Code)— (i) by striking paragraphs (1) through (5); (ii) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and inserting the following: , except that such term does not include a sworn federal law enforcement officer of a covered federal law enforcement agency as defined in section 11712(d) of the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 (sec. 5–133.17(d), D.C. Official Code). ; (iii) by redesignating paragraphs (6) and (7) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; (iv) by striking paragraphs (8) through (11); and (v) by redesignating paragraph (12) as paragraph (3); and (C) in section 128 (sec. 5–365.02, D.C. Official Code), by striking subsections (a), (b), and (c) and inserting the following: If a law enforcement officer encounters a suspect fleeing in a motor vehicle, the officer may engage in a vehicular pursuit of the suspect unless the officer, or a higher-ranking official with supervisory authority over the officer, reasonably believes that— (1) vehicular pursuit would— (A) entail an unacceptable risk of harm to a person other than the suspect; or (B) be futile; or (2) the suspect can be apprehended more effectively or expeditiously by a means other than vehicular pursuit. ; and (2) in the table of contents, by striking the item relating to subtitle S of title I and inserting the following: SUBTITLE S. USE OF VEHICULAR PURSUITS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS 33 . (b) Department of Justice report on PursuitAlert Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall— (1) evaluate the costs and benefits of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia adopting PursuitAlert or another similar technology capable of alerting members of the public to the presence of a police pursuit in their immediate vicinity; and (2) publish a report on the evaluation conducted under paragraph (1) and submit the report to— (A) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; (B) the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; (C) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives; and (D) the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives. Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2025. Kevin F. McCumber, Clerk.
Loading intelligence layer…